<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009: Tart&#8217;s List of Most-Listened To Records&#8230; spend time on these, eh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:48:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berkeley Place &#187; TOP 10 MOST LISTENED TO ALBUMS OF THE YEAR</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2800</link>
		<dc:creator>Berkeley Place &#187; TOP 10 MOST LISTENED TO ALBUMS OF THE YEAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2800</guid>
		<description>[...] pal at Slowcoustic got this idea from Tarty Tart, but I think it&#8217;s a cool one.  It&#8217;s a list, without cheating, of my most listened to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pal at Slowcoustic got this idea from Tarty Tart, but I think it&#8217;s a cool one.  It&#8217;s a list, without cheating, of my most listened to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tart</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Tart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I hoe my own row I guess, haha! That Ice Palace was a real grower but damn, it hits me right between the eyes every time I play it now. xox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I hoe my own row I guess, haha! That Ice Palace was a real grower but damn, it hits me right between the eyes every time I play it now. xox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kata rokkar</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>kata rokkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>Meursault, Ice Palace, Pure Reason Revolution? Did not see that coming. Awesome list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meursault, Ice Palace, Pure Reason Revolution? Did not see that coming. Awesome list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>Lists, my dear, as you know, those so-called &#039;Best Of&#039; types &amp; their like, as I have said time &amp; again, are fucking pointless pointless tasks. At best they are thinly veiled &#039;my taste is better than yours&#039; pissing competitions, &amp; at worst they are thinly veiled &#039;my taste is better than yours&#039; pissing competitions.  

M&amp;S we are agreed upon - I think it&#039;s a great album, but I do wonder about the way this whole release package was engineered: LP made up of little under 40% new material, with remainder previously released on EPs in Europe.  Therefore the natural/obvious audience would be, surely, the US (what traditionally don&#039;t do/get EPs so much).  But, Lo!  They don&#039;t release it in the US.  Fuckinell&#039;s up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lists, my dear, as you know, those so-called &#8216;Best Of&#8217; types &amp; their like, as I have said time &amp; again, are fucking pointless pointless tasks. At best they are thinly veiled &#8216;my taste is better than yours&#8217; pissing competitions, &amp; at worst they are thinly veiled &#8216;my taste is better than yours&#8217; pissing competitions.  </p>
<p>M&amp;S we are agreed upon &#8211; I think it&#8217;s a great album, but I do wonder about the way this whole release package was engineered: LP made up of little under 40% new material, with remainder previously released on EPs in Europe.  Therefore the natural/obvious audience would be, surely, the US (what traditionally don&#8217;t do/get EPs so much).  But, Lo!  They don&#8217;t release it in the US.  Fuckinell&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tart</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2701</link>
		<dc:creator>Tart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2701</guid>
		<description>This is why lists are so fucking stupid to make! Expectations are so completely different when you&#039;ve known a band and seen their progress and heard the demos and session tapes and actually touched the making of the thing. I know you feel the same way re: M&amp;S&#039;s album ... that it could/should maybe have been more, but to our ears, those of us who hadn&#039;t heard a note of any of it before it was/is astounding! And the B&amp;B are the same to me. I never listened to the first album so this one was something that hit me square between the eyes. It is a powerful piece of work on it&#039;s own merit. But I can see your perspective too. Lists, grrrr..... the end of all of us, I swear it!!! 

The Felice Bros... well that&#039;s a whole other kettle of fish. Men&#039;s music, I say. Never got that whole thing, but admit I never really tried either, beyond Calexico which I do enjoy on a limited basis. xoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why lists are so fucking stupid to make! Expectations are so completely different when you&#8217;ve known a band and seen their progress and heard the demos and session tapes and actually touched the making of the thing. I know you feel the same way re: M&#038;S&#8217;s album &#8230; that it could/should maybe have been more, but to our ears, those of us who hadn&#8217;t heard a note of any of it before it was/is astounding! And the B&#038;B are the same to me. I never listened to the first album so this one was something that hit me square between the eyes. It is a powerful piece of work on it&#8217;s own merit. But I can see your perspective too. Lists, grrrr&#8230;.. the end of all of us, I swear it!!! </p>
<p>The Felice Bros&#8230; well that&#8217;s a whole other kettle of fish. Men&#8217;s music, I say. Never got that whole thing, but admit I never really tried either, beyond Calexico which I do enjoy on a limited basis. xoxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>Sorry Chutters but compared to their debuts they were both very disappointing for me.  I was expecting movement away from their debuts, not a retreat into the fetal position of safe retread.  Sorry, but that&#039;s basically what both albums were.  Sure, there were some excellent songs on each (as there were one or two decent tracks on tthe Bowerbirds album) but a handful of songs do not a good album make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Chutters but compared to their debuts they were both very disappointing for me.  I was expecting movement away from their debuts, not a retreat into the fetal position of safe retread.  Sorry, but that&#8217;s basically what both albums were.  Sure, there were some excellent songs on each (as there were one or two decent tracks on tthe Bowerbirds album) but a handful of songs do not a good album make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rampant Chutney Consumerism</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Rampant Chutney Consumerism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>i can agree with DC on it not being a shite year for music, however to say the Felice Brothers and The Builders &amp; The Butchers albums were disappointing is a bit harsh. Yes, The Felice Brothers album didn&#039;t match the heady hights of the previous one, but this doesn&#039;t mean that it was in anyway disappointing, i&#039;ve found it to be a very rewarding album after repeated listens. And the amount of accolades that people heap upon the first B&amp;B album must mean it is the best album of all time, i think i will be sorely disappointed by the time i get around to listening to it! 

Anyway i like you list Miss, and i will fire my fave 20 songs of the year you way soon.

PS i&#039;d forgotten all about Clem Snide!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i can agree with DC on it not being a shite year for music, however to say the Felice Brothers and The Builders &amp; The Butchers albums were disappointing is a bit harsh. Yes, The Felice Brothers album didn&#8217;t match the heady hights of the previous one, but this doesn&#8217;t mean that it was in anyway disappointing, i&#8217;ve found it to be a very rewarding album after repeated listens. And the amount of accolades that people heap upon the first B&amp;B album must mean it is the best album of all time, i think i will be sorely disappointed by the time i get around to listening to it! </p>
<p>Anyway i like you list Miss, and i will fire my fave 20 songs of the year you way soon.</p>
<p>PS i&#8217;d forgotten all about Clem Snide!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2674</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2674</guid>
		<description>Apologies on the delivery front :) I have been snowed under this year with albums (I did a quick count &amp; I reckon we were almost in 5 figures in terms of submissions across the board: Alobums, EPs &amp; Singles) &amp; as soon as I get one that&#039;s remarkable I get stuck in an avalanche of many more to listen to &amp; filter.  Therefore my &#039;sharing&#039; quota gets lost/forgotten about.  I will make amends in the New Year, tho, rest assured.  

I think the one thing that 2009 showed was follow up (2nd) albums were, in general, quite shite or utterly disappointing.  Bowerbirds, Felice Brothers, The Builders &amp; The Butchers? All of them very disappointing. I know you&#039;ll have me for mentioning tB&amp;tB in that, &amp; I know they&#039;d probably quite hurt to know I was disappointed by it in general, but I was in on the ground floor &amp; their debut &amp; original EP were quite flawless.  Lofty heights to ascend by reply, I&#039;m afraid.

Debuts, on the other hand, were amazing.  Sure there was some dross but those bolts out of ther blue, when they were good, were generally phenomenal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies on the delivery front <img src='http://www.loveshackbaby.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I have been snowed under this year with albums (I did a quick count &amp; I reckon we were almost in 5 figures in terms of submissions across the board: Alobums, EPs &amp; Singles) &amp; as soon as I get one that&#8217;s remarkable I get stuck in an avalanche of many more to listen to &amp; filter.  Therefore my &#8216;sharing&#8217; quota gets lost/forgotten about.  I will make amends in the New Year, tho, rest assured.  </p>
<p>I think the one thing that 2009 showed was follow up (2nd) albums were, in general, quite shite or utterly disappointing.  Bowerbirds, Felice Brothers, The Builders &amp; The Butchers? All of them very disappointing. I know you&#8217;ll have me for mentioning tB&amp;tB in that, &amp; I know they&#8217;d probably quite hurt to know I was disappointed by it in general, but I was in on the ground floor &amp; their debut &amp; original EP were quite flawless.  Lofty heights to ascend by reply, I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
<p>Debuts, on the other hand, were amazing.  Sure there was some dross but those bolts out of ther blue, when they were good, were generally phenomenal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tart</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>Tart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>Yeah well... that&#039;s why I made clear that this list is what I listened to. It&#039;s what struck my fancy as the year progressed and then at the end I had a list of things that I really wanted to listen to and hadn&#039;t the time. I think those would have been in heavy rotation if I&#039;d have received them a few months earlier, hint, hint! You&#039;ve really got to stop hoarding the good ones all to yourself, DC! 

And yeah 2009 was a killer year for debuts especially. Thanks for turning me onto at least a third to half of what&#039;s on my list this year xoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah well&#8230; that&#8217;s why I made clear that this list is what I listened to. It&#8217;s what struck my fancy as the year progressed and then at the end I had a list of things that I really wanted to listen to and hadn&#8217;t the time. I think those would have been in heavy rotation if I&#8217;d have received them a few months earlier, hint, hint! You&#8217;ve really got to stop hoarding the good ones all to yourself, DC! </p>
<p>And yeah 2009 was a killer year for debuts especially. Thanks for turning me onto at least a third to half of what&#8217;s on my list this year xoxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://www.loveshackbaby.net/2009/12/2009-tarts-list-of-most-listened-to-records-spend-time-on-these-eh/comment-page-1/#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveshackbaby.net/?p=5553#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>Very interestink, ol&#039; Tarticles.

There are a few in there that highlight where out taste splits e.e Experimental De3ntal School.  Like, really? Meh.  But then you say the same to me about Jordaan mason &amp; The Horse Museum, so I guess we&#039;re about quits.

I&#039;ve said this previously, &amp; I have battered you with this, but Nic Dawson Kelly&#039;s LP &quot;Old Valentine&quot; is perhaps the most consistently brilliant album of 2009.  It&#039;s out of the ordinary for me to say something so definite like that, given my aversion to &#039;Best Of&#039; lists or declaring favorites &amp; such, BUT this is fucking good album.  It makes me beam like a mental whenever the first note strikes up — Bryan Ferry meets Gomez.  Fucking brilliant.

As you know &amp; we have discussed, 2009 was an excellent year for albums &amp; music (from all genres) in general (don&#039;t let any myopic fuckwit try &amp; tell you otherwise based on their narrow listening spectrum) — I&#039;d go so far as to say it&#039;s one of the best in living memory. 2010 has a LOT to live up to, however it seems to be shaping up rather keenly:  the newbies from Basia Bulat, First Aid Kit &amp; Los Campesinos! (to name a tiny few of the advance copies floating about thus far) are really rather good.  So, who knows.  Next year might kill us with quality &amp; quantity all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interestink, ol&#8217; Tarticles.</p>
<p>There are a few in there that highlight where out taste splits e.e Experimental De3ntal School.  Like, really? Meh.  But then you say the same to me about Jordaan mason &amp; The Horse Museum, so I guess we&#8217;re about quits.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said this previously, &amp; I have battered you with this, but Nic Dawson Kelly&#8217;s LP &#8220;Old Valentine&#8221; is perhaps the most consistently brilliant album of 2009.  It&#8217;s out of the ordinary for me to say something so definite like that, given my aversion to &#8216;Best Of&#8217; lists or declaring favorites &amp; such, BUT this is fucking good album.  It makes me beam like a mental whenever the first note strikes up — Bryan Ferry meets Gomez.  Fucking brilliant.</p>
<p>As you know &amp; we have discussed, 2009 was an excellent year for albums &amp; music (from all genres) in general (don&#8217;t let any myopic fuckwit try &amp; tell you otherwise based on their narrow listening spectrum) — I&#8217;d go so far as to say it&#8217;s one of the best in living memory. 2010 has a LOT to live up to, however it seems to be shaping up rather keenly:  the newbies from Basia Bulat, First Aid Kit &amp; Los Campesinos! (to name a tiny few of the advance copies floating about thus far) are really rather good.  So, who knows.  Next year might kill us with quality &amp; quantity all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
